2016-01-31 23:25 GMT+01:00 Gert Wollny <[email protected]>: > Hello Anton, > > in that case I'll prepare an upload for 6.2.1, since this already fixes > the bug, could be uploaded without passing through NEW, and shouldn't > need much work. With this we would at least get this fix into testing > without a vtk-7 transition. >
OK, just push into git. > Since 6.3.0 breaks some things, i.e. legacy code was removed and with > this itksnap required some fixes, directly moving to vtk-7 later on > really makes more sense, but I wonder whether vtk 6 and 7 should co > -exist in Stretch, whether we should push for updating all to vtk-7, > Well, I think it would be better to update ParaView first, which is outdated in Debian. VTK 7 for Stretch is an open question for now. Thanks Anton
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
