* Daniele E. Domenichelli <ddomeniche...@drdanz.it> [2016-08-11 18:57]: > Another reason why I would like a cmake config file installed with the > package and not a Findstd_msgs.cmake file in my projects is to be able > to check the version... At some point, perhaps, some message might be > added, removed, or modified, and I would like to be able to pass the > version to find_package and be sure that the version found is compatible > with the one I require. > But perhaps this is something that should be fixed upstream (i.e. in > catkin)? I'm not sure if it is still in development or if it is frozen > though, since for ROS2 they are using a different tool.
Yes, talking to upstream about it is a good idea and judging from the git repo it is quite active: https://github.com/ros/catkin/commits/kinetic-devel > From the tests I made, I couldn't find any difference, the messages are > probably used only to produce the bindings, but they are useless for ROS > user after. > So perhaps "Recommends" is too much. Maybe "Suggests"? Or maybe > nothing... I think people doing development in ROS will use the available meta packages and get them automatically. > Perfect, I'll work on that as soon as possible then, but I'll be on > holiday until Tuesday though, so it will have to wait for a few days... No problem, enjoy your vocation. Btw. would you be interested to regularly work on the packages? There is still a lot that needs to be done, so we would be glad to have an other helping (and thinking ;) ) hand. You can find the current process here: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Robotics/ROS Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
