At least I know exactly why. Versioned releases that weren't checked against existing packages.
We're looking at it upstream: https://sourceforge.net/p/apertium/mailman/apertium-stuff/thread/CABnmVq6kba5DjbFL8Kt9U_NFPrdZdO0-WVrLo6KSMdsgHkVrig%40mail.gmail.com/ -- Tino Didriksen On 18 June 2017 at 21:29, Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> wrote: > Something recently broke the build of apertium-spa-cat: > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/apertium-spa-cat.html > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/ > unstable/amd64/apertium-spa-cat.html > > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > '/usr/share/apertium/apertium-cat/cat_valencia.autogen.bin', > needed by 'spa-cat_valencia.autogen.bin'. Stop. >
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
