Source: apertium-nno Version: 0.9.0~r69513-1 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid
Some recent change in unstable makes apertium-nno FTBFS: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/apertium-nno.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/apertium-nno.html ... make -j1 make[1]: Entering directory '/build/1st/apertium-nno-0.9.0~r69513' apertium-validate-dictionary apertium-nno.nno.dix apertium-nno.nno.dix validates lt-comp lr apertium-nno.nno.dix nno.automorf.bin final@inconditional 42 218 main@standard 88076 227631 apertium-validate-dictionary apertium-nno.nno.dix apertium-nno.nno.dix validates lt-comp --alt nno_a rl apertium-nno.nno.dix nno.autogen.bin final@inconditional 42 218 main@standard 87248 216119 apertium-validate-dictionary apertium-nno.nno.dix apertium-nno.nno.dix validates lt-comp --alt nno_e rl apertium-nno.nno.dix nno_e.autogen.bin final@inconditional 42 218 main@standard 87089 215960 lt-print nno.automorf.bin | gzip -9 -c -n > nno.automorf.att.gz lt-print nno.autogen.bin | gzip -9 -c -n > nno.autogen.att.gz /usr/bin/cg-comp apertium-nno.nno.rlx nno.rlx.bin apertium-nno.nno.rlx: Error: Position on line 6990 near `O inf)␊;␊#sjeldent i` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0? apertium-nno.nno.rlx: Warning: Expected closing ; on line 52066 after previous rule! Error: Grammar could not be parsed - exiting! Makefile:752: recipe for target 'nno.rlx.bin' failed make[1]: *** [nno.rlx.bin] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/1st/apertium-nno-0.9.0~r69513' dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2 debian/rules:9: recipe for target 'build' failed make: *** [build] Error 2 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers