Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:52:27 +0200
with message-id <cb4ea6f2-066c-c3d5-65b4-554c8278f...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#865522: scilab: Segmentation fault at lauch
has caused the Debian Bug report #865522,
regarding scilab: Segmentation fault at launch. It was working before an 
upgrade performed on 21 June.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
865522: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865522
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: scilab
Version: 5.5.1-7
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.8
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages scilab depends on:
ii  scilab-cli       5.5.1-7
ii  scilab-full-bin  5.5.1-7

Versions of packages scilab recommends:
ii  scilab-doc  5.5.1-7

Versions of packages scilab suggests:
pn  scilab-doc-fr     <none>
pn  scilab-doc-ja     <none>
pn  scilab-doc-pt-br  <none>

-- no debconf information

*** /home/moralles/Scilab_Bug.txt
SCILABBIN : scilab-bin
DISABLE_JAVA_DETECTION : 0
SCILAB_MODE : gui
OS : Linux
MODEL : x86_64
IS_SCILAB_BINARY : 0
Using specified vm: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle
JAVA_HOME : /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle
SCI : /usr/share/scilab/
SCIBIN : /usr/bin/scilab-bin
PATH :
/usr/share/scilab/:/usr/share/scilab//bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/bin:/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/db/bin:/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre/bin
CLASSPATH : /usr/share/scilab//modules/core/jar/org.scilab.modules.core.jar
EGL_DRIVER :
LD_LIBRARY_PATH :
/usr/lib/scilab/:/usr/lib64/scilab/:.:/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre/lib/amd64/:/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre/lib/amd64/server/:/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:58:40 -0300 Marcio Bezerra
<marciobdbeze...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like this bug was introduced in the latest kernel libraries update.
> Scilab was working just fine less than 24 hours ago. Scilab-cli is working
> but is very limited. Does anyone know of a workaround for this kind of
> problem? How long does it usually take for them to release a patch?
> 
> I have downloaded Octave but it's not the same.
> 
> Much appreciated.
> 
> Marcio
> 
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:24 PM, trb <tere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I have the same bug on Debian 9 with KDE Plasma.
> > I had the same problem on Arch, maybe this is related to the kernel ? (
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scilab/+bug/1699892 )
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Piotr
> >

According to [1] this is kernel bug #865311 [2] which is now fixed, thus
closing this one.

[1] https://askubuntu.com/a/927824
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865311

_g.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to