Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2017 03:23:25 +0000
with message-id <e1drygr-00074x...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#875564: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #874802,
regarding libcblas3 and libatlas3-base: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
874802: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874802
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libatlas3-base,libcblas3
Version: libatlas3-base/3.10.3-4
Version: libcblas3/3.2.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite

Date: 2017-09-09
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid

Hi,

automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:


Selecting previously unselected package gcc-7-base:amd64.
(Reading database ... 10979 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../gcc-7-base_7.2.0-4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking gcc-7-base:amd64 (7.2.0-4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libquadmath0:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libquadmath0_7.2.0-4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libquadmath0:amd64 (7.2.0-4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgfortran4:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libgfortran4_7.2.0-4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgfortran4:amd64 (7.2.0-4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libatlas3-base:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libatlas3-base_3.10.3-4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libatlas3-base:amd64 (3.10.3-4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libblas-common.
Preparing to unpack .../libblas-common_3.7.1-1+b1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libblas-common (3.7.1-1+b1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libf2c2:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libf2c2_20130926-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libf2c2:amd64 (20130926-2) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libcblas3.
Preparing to unpack .../libcblas3_3.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libcblas3 (3.2.1+dfsg-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libcblas3_3.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcblas.so.3', which is also 
in package libatlas3-base:amd64 3.10.3-4
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-17) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libcblas3_3.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would
consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming
or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the
circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file
diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a
last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual
Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and
diversions should only be used when packages provide different
implementations for the same functionality.

Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):

  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcblas.so.3

This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of
the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then
also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug.

-Ralf.

PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors
of this kind see http://qa.debian.org/dose/file-overwrites.html.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.2.1+dfsg-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package clapack has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/875564

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to