Hello Tobias, thanks for the hint. I have just upload a corrected version. 
Jerome

On 27/01/18 17:19, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 01/27/2018 01:41 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello Vincent, thanks for your bugreport.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27/01/18 06:31, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> Package: src:mpfi
>>> Version: 1.5.3+ds-1
>>> Severity: serious
>>> Justification: Policy 7.2
>>>
>>> The current libmpfi-dev version is 1.5.3+ds-1+b1, which has:
>>>
>>> Depends: libmpfi0 (= 1.5.3+ds-1+b1), libmpfi-dev-common (= 1.5.3+ds-1), 
>>> libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev
>>>
>>> but libmpfi-dev-common 1.5.3+ds-1 has:
>>>
>>> Recommends: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.3+ds-1)
>>>
>>> This is inconsistent.
>> This true.
>>
>> Do you have any idea from where comes the +b1 ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jerome
> 
> Hi,
> 
> the +b1 was appended to the binary version for the rebuild against libmpfr6. 
> This is a matter of using (=${binary:Version}) vs. (=${source:Version}) in 
> debian/control.
> 
> Best,
> Tobias
> 

-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to