Hi all, please pay attention that Qt4 can be removed soon. So if upstream did not start to port the software to Qt5 it would be good to do so.
Regards Anton 2018-03-11 8:54 GMT+01:00 W. Martin Borgert <deba...@debian.org>: > On 2018-03-11 07:44, Anton Gladky wrote: >> I have added the Denis to the Debian Science Team and >> created an empty repo for qelectrotech . > > Thanks, Anton! > > I pushed the existing branches from > http://git.tuxfamily.org/qet/debian.git > to > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/qelectrotech > > Denis, you may use the new git repo now :~) > > Btw. the layout of the repo seems a little bit unusual. > It is only the content of the debian directory, but without the > "debian" dir itself. > Maybe we can change this to the more DEP-14-ish layout? > (http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14/) > And with complete upstream sources? > I can do this, if nobody objects. > Denis, Laurent, is that OK? > > Cheers > > PS: If I see it correctly, the documentation to QET is separate > from the source code itself, right? When we are done with the > 0.6 package, it would be nice to package the documentation, too. > Only last week, I was happy that Debian has a lot of -doc > packaged (and I had installed at least some of it), when the > internet connection of my company broke for some hours! -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers