On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Thomas Weber wrote: > Hello, > > Am Mittwoch, den 25.01.2006, 22:51 +1100 schrieb Tim Connors: > > Removing a package from debian that will keep on working until the heat > > death of the universe is not necessary as long as there are no release > > critical bugs opened against the package. > > > LaTeX is quite backwards > > compatible. Pdfscreen will keep on working for quite some time... > > No, it's already broken if you use babel with some options: > http://sarovar.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=26&group_id=8&atid=113
But is a package that doesn't work for some people with some options worthy of being called "irredeemably broken", and hence removed from the archive? Anyway, this is quite OT for deb-sci, so I shall attempt to say no more :) -- TimC I've told them and told them: Temporal anomalies are different from spatial anomalies. But the kittens know better. They laugh at my feeble attempts to fool them. -- barbara in ARK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
