On Saturday 13 January 2007 14:58, Francesco Pietra wrote: > That's OK and jmol 11 is running here, although not > yet tried. Thank you.
OK, good to hear that. > If anything, I was surprised that jmol does not look > into MPQC. Ah, well... I have never noticed it before. Looks interesting. If you email me two or three output files (e.g. water geom optimization, maybe a vibration calculation, or so), then I'll see to that Jmol gets reading support for MPQC output. How does it compare to http://openmopac.net/ ? Egon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cologne University Bioinformatics Center (CUBIC) Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
