Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did > not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers > of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain. > > If you have suggestions, critique, or you are busy but accept NMU'ing > your packages for gfortran transition.. please speak now.
Hi Riku, I did see it and it seemed very reasonable. I am waiting to hear about a suggested order in which the blas-depending packages should be uploaded. Cernlib-related components can be uploaded in the following order once blas, lapack (and ideally atlas) are taken care of: cernlib mclibs / paw (these two are independent) geant321 / mn-fit (these are independent but must each follow paw) I'd prefer to do the uploads myself since these packages are rather finicky. best regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
