[ Friday 16 May 2008 ] | On Fri, 16 May 2008, Frederic Lehobey wrote: | >> Regarding blitz, I often use blitz and I am quite knowledgeable in the | >> underlying techniques. Let me know if you need some help. | > | > So I think it is to blitz maintainer to decide whether he wants to | > join pkg-scicomp of debian-science as both seems to be relevant. | | Well, I (while wearing my libblitz++ maintainer hat) am not really picky | about with whom to share the work (which seems quite less because of nearly | dead upstream) but I (while wearing my Debian Science CDD hat) prefer the | idea of a general, well-structured common Debian Science repository and | thus I'd prefer this VCS. Saying so I plan to inject libblitz over the | weekend there. Ok and thanks for maintaining blitz++
| > I understand from your message pkg-scicomp is not designed to gather | > more general scientific software outside the scope you gave | > above. blitz in this case was both in the pkg-scicomp and | > debian-science scope (the latter one being broader). | | Which I prefer because I consider the work to be done not only as packaging | work. There is no problem in adding further Uploaders - even a pkg-scicomp | mailing list might be listed as "Uploaders". Ok Best regards C. -- Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~prudhomm/ Scientific computing packages maintainer Fingerprint = 3703 50DE 7A9F 024E 0F26 0D07 A18F B40B D4BE 1450 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
