On 09/06/2008, Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The second reason is that although the OCTPL seems to be a free license, > upstream's interpretation of it is not. The paragraph starting with "In > short" on http://www.opencascade.org/occ/license/ introduces the > non-free requirement that one send all modifications to them, which is > nowhere in the license itself.
Now, this part is downright bizarre. Further proof that tampering with good things like the GPL comes from people who are confused with its intent and purpose. I hope that this doesn't mean that once you remove the triangle software (Delaunay triangulation, is it, or something harder to reimplement?), that upstream's confusion about their own license won't stop it from trickling down to main. - Jordi G. H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
