On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 16:36 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 19:41 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > > On 14/06/2008, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Personally, I'm pretty sympathetic with people who want to restrict to > > > non-commercial use. > > > > I'm not. I think they are confused, believe that "free" and > > "commercial" are binary opposites and misunderstand the nature of > > software freedom. > > Note that there is no commercial use restriction on triangle, the > restriction is on making money for distribution. So you can download it > at no cost and then use it for commercial purposes, and still be within > the license. But if anyone wants to charge money for distributing it, > that requires a separate arrangement. > > Thanks everyone for looking into relicensing and/or reimplementation! > > -Adam That's encouraging. If the author has gone that far, persuading him to go just a little further may be easier.
Ross -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
