Le Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:17:07PM +0200, Michael Banck a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:40:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > - Prepare files named 'reference' of 'citation' in the source package. > > Did you mean 'reference' *or* 'citation'? As I argued elsewhere, I > think both are quite different, and both files have their merit.
Sorry for the typo. I wanted to write 'or', but I do not mean to be restrictive. I have nothing against using both. My personnal preference would be to have only one place that contains parsable references (probably in BibTeX format), and later to use scripts to generate other facilities (like the 'citation' file), but my intention is to brainstorm, not to push for my ideas. What matters in the end is to make a consensus emerge. Maybe by experimenting some implementations we will have a better idea of the shortcommings, work-intensiveness and practicability of our propositions. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
