Am Montag, den 10.11.2008, 13:03 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV: > On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 18:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Am Montag, den 10.11.2008, 10:05 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
[..] > > > One other thing: why is the ARPACK tree unpacked in the root and a > > > separate directory? The debian/rules file has no references to the > > > ARPACK directory. Can I just wipe it out? > > > > Think so. But you should check, if it is maybe cleaner to remove the > > copy in the root directory and use the stuff in ARPACK, because this > > package is a compilation of ARPACK and PARPACK. But some time has passed > > since I touched the package, so you need to check this carefully. > > Thanks. There are actually some differences, like "second" in ARPACK is > "arscnd" in root. > > There are a lot of diffs vs. upstream, where can I get your .orig.tar.gz > or a procedure for making it from upstream tarballs? Not "my" :) I just helped getting it into some better shape. The upstream sources should be here: http://www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/download.html. But Christophe Prud'homme AFAIK put them together. [..] > Neither debian/rules nor any Makefile references ARPACK, but you're > right, a couple of patches apply to that directory. Like second is > changed to secnd2 in ARPACK but not root, Correct, but it is not applied. > and noetime applies to ARPACK but not root. This one applies to both and is necessary to compile with gfortran. > I'll try to figure it out and make it work. But I really need > the .orig.tar.gz which is not on any of the mirrors since it's been > removed. Ubuntu still has it: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libarpack2 Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
