On 16/06/09 at 11:57 -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:06:34 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > This raises an interesting question: if we package mpich2, couldn't we > > drop mpich(1) and LAM from Debian? Are there cases where it's more > > interesting to use mpich v1 or LAM than mpich2 or OpenMPI? > > yes, there are many scientific tools that are mpich1-only, so debian > should continue to support both versions for as long as it is feasible.
Why are they mpich1-only? (What's blocking?) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
