Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: > OK, so I guess we have hijacked this thread for a discussion of Torque > packaging. Sorry about that! I hope the OP is content with the feedback so > far, and perhaps will try out torque and help debug the packages ;-) > :)
> Now I see that Steffen also has submitted the 2.3.6 branch to Debian, I have > to go back and study some of his emails over the summer to see exactly what > the reason was. The arrival of 2.3.7 was the reason, and the anticipation of seeing the same package then both in Debian and Ubuntu. > Regarding the license, we've discussed it at length. In Ubuntu, the package > is in "multiverse" which I gather is the equivalent of Debian "non-free". In > my opinion, the torque software must be considered to be covered by the > license text included in the distributed tarball. For your reference, I > enclose as an attacment a copy of a mail I sent in january to Steffen & > Michael where the various versions of the Torque license (all called OpenPBS > 2.3. > > I also wrote an email to one of the Torque devs (attached) but I never got a > reply. I got one - they (clusterresources.com) don't care about what we do and declare Torque as a community project that they are not so much responsible for. > I dunno, perhaps all this just adds to the confusion :-) More of it, please. Cheers, Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
