Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 10:46 +0100, Gabriele Giacone a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > > The point is: If a sponsor sees a need for applying minor changes to > > your work it is much easier to propagate these via VCS (bee it git or > > svn) than a sequence of mails and reuploading to mentors. Group > > maintenance and sponsoring becomes way easier when using a VCS and > > so I wished the wording would be stronger to make people use it. > > IMHO, if we're talking about packages that constantly need, for > whatever reasons, to be modified and to be modified by different > maintainers, yes, VCS would be better without a doubt. > For other packages and for unexpected sponsor needs, "apt-get source > <package>" + changes + upload can be enough. Sorry but I don't agree with you. VCS is important to keep history, tags and also allow new maintainers to contribute within a team.
I upload it once you import it. Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
