On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:14:32PM +0200, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > I replace for now I think most of the cdd -> blends
Cool. Thanks! > taking care of a package is quite time consumming especially if you are also > the upstream. > So the more peoples are involve in this debian-science, the easyer it will be > for all of us. Yes, that's the idea. > I hope that debian-science will become a reference for most of scientists > where you can find > most of the scientific software product and convince peoples to release there > software with a dfsg > compliant licence. This is an explicite goal of Debian Science and IMHO we are not really far away (about squeeze+2 or squeeze+3). > This non commercial clause cause that we found in a great number of > scientific software > is realy a problem. Unfortunately yes. > what is the position of debian science for the distribute of that kind of > software ? Debian Science can not have a different opinion from general Debian and ftpmaster: It's just non-free (and it is a pity in most of the cases). > I am working now on the tango packaging for the dataacquisition. [1] > > [1] http://tango-controls.org Good luck with the packaging - feel free to ask here in case of trouble. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
