Hi Charles, On 10/04/2010 05:37 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:37:11PM +0200, Christian Kastner a écrit : >> On 10/04/2010 08:40 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> biology::nuceleic-acids >>> biology::peptidic >>> biology::format:* >> Off the top of my hat, biology::format:* should go into >> works-with-format::*, and the other two maybe could be just moved to >> fields::biology:. > > In the past, I tended to want to describe packages in details with Debtags, > but > nowardays I feel that the best is to use combinations of generic facets. For > instance field::biology + works-with::image for biological imaging instead of > field::biology:imaging.
This is also what I was aiming for in my initial mail -- you just expressed it better, and with far fewer words :-) Quoting the relevant part: On 10/03/2010 10:38 PM, Christian Kastner wrote: > The science:: facet has some overlap with the use::facet, for example: > science::calculation > use::calculating > science::visualization > use::viewing (description says: "Data Visualization") > > Personally, I'd prefer to see all these generalized to uses:: and > specialized by field:: or whatever, if that is even necessary. I will include a list of such potential overlaps in my proposal in the wiki page. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
