On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 20:39 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:29:50AM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 20:35 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:43:03PM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote: > > > > > Adding Review means you can also add WrapITK. Something I think is a > > > > good idea, but others may not. > > > > > > That's an interesting idea: make two API-breaking moves at the same > > > time! :-) > > > > > > On the other hand, ITK v4 is moving to WrapITK for wrapping. So this > > > also is a change that will happen eventually. > > > > > > Will this break anything in Debian? I can't find any reverse-depends > > > on the java, python, or tcl bindings. > > > > I don't know of anything it would break. > > I thought the WrapITK bindings used different symbol names from the > cswig-style wrapping [1], so I'd expect all non-C++ code to break. > I'm wondering if there is python or tcl ITK-using code in Debian. > > > [1] > http://old.nabble.com/ITK-3.10.1-Packages-for-Ubuntu-8.04-and-8.10-td21568917.html
Sorry, I wasn't being clear. I meant I don't know of anything, but I haven't really looked. Yes, code (python or tcl) written using the old wrapping style would not work with WrapITK. -Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1288272190.3236.4.ca...@pauldesktop
