Yaroslav, Too late. I did request for ROM and it was executed quite quickly. I just re-uploaded paraview:
$ dupload paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.changes dupload note: no announcement will be sent. Checking signatures before upload......signatures are ok Uploading (ftp) to ftp.upload.debian.org:/pub/UploadQueue/ [ job paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64 from paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.changes paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb, size ok, md5sum ok, sha1sum ok, sha256sum ok paraview_3.8.1-2.diff.gz, size ok, md5sum ok, sha1sum ok, sha256sum ok paraview_3.8.1-2.dsc, size ok, md5sum ok, sha1sum ok, sha256sum ok paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.changes ok ] Uploading (ftp) to anonymous-ftp-master (ftp.upload.debian.org) [ Uploading job paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64 paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb 39316.4 kB, ok (371 s, 105.97 kB/s) paraview_3.8.1-2.diff.gz 24.6 kB, ok (1 s, 24.58 kB/s) paraview_3.8.1-2.dsc 1.8 kB, ok (1 s, 1.77 kB/s) paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.changes 1.5 kB, ok (1 s, 1.53 kB/s) ] Thanks On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > why not to augment upstream version? e.g. 3.8.1+1 ? additionally you > could add a note to debian/README.Debian-source or just debian/README > describing the WTF, or just mention in the changelog entry... I see no > objective reason to mess with ftp removals or waiting for a new release > > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> Le mardi 22 février 2011 à 09:58 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : >> > Hi, > >> > I am reading the following bug: > >> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611840 > >> > I clearly did the first upload: > >> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/paraview/news/20100819T093347Z.html > >> > However I do not understand what could have happen that I did not >> > upload paraview 3.8.1 tarball (maybe I used a release candidate...). >> > Anyway to solve this issue I need to re-upload the same package >> > (same version!), but I fear ftp will drop it since md5sum will not >> > match. >> > does anyone knows what to do in this case ? >> I guess you would have to ask for a removal and then reupload it >> (however, it might have to go through NEW again). >> Otherwise, the lazy way would be to wait for a new upstream release. > > >> Sylvestre > -- > =------------------------------------------------------------------= > Keep in touch www.onerussian.com > Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic > -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
