Le mardi 21 juin 2011 à 13:29 +1000, Drew Parsons a écrit : > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 08:33 -0400, Manjusha Joshi wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Brett Viren <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sylvestre Ledru <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > == Proposal == > > > > > > I would like to propose the following: > > > * move all packaging related discussions to > > > [email protected] > > > * use [email protected] only for user oriented > > discussions > > > * make sure that all the commit mails are sent on > > > [email protected] > > > > > Benefit is we also get updates about packages and that is really > > useful for us. > > As Linux user cannot remain only user, need to do system admin level > > work also for scientific packages. > > Second thing is, after making 2 separate list will there be increase > > in the user level queries? At present there are hardly user related > > queries. > > > > > In practice I'm inclined to disagree with the proposal. That is, in one > sense it arguably makes sense in principle to keep packing discussions > separate from user discussions. But I agree with Manjusha that > > a) it could be useful to have the user's perspective on packaging > questions Sure. But I guess such users would join also [email protected].
> b) users could potential find it useful to hear what we're up to and > what decisions we're making on packages. They will be affected by those > decisions. Same here. > c) I haven't noticed that many user-level discussions anyway. What > problem are we trying to solve here? Have user discussions been impeded > by packaging discussions? Is it the intention of the proposal to > encourage more user discussion by shifting out all packaging discussion? Exactly. Anyway, thanks to you two for your comments, Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
