Torsdag 14 juli 2011 10.39.32 skrev du: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Lifeng Sun <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:12 PM, roucaries bastien > > > >>>> Though CLHEP is released under GPL-3 and LGPL-3 dual licenses > >>>> since > >>>> 2.1.0.0, the Matrix sub-library of CLHEP still has an > >>>> anti-commercial > >>>> clause in its license, e.g., > >>>> > >>>> /* Matrix/Matrix/Matrix.h */ > >>>> > >>>> // Creation of derivative forms of this software for commercial > >>>> // utilization may be subject to restriction; written permission > >>>> may be // obtained from Cornell University. > >>>> > >>>> and I failed to convince the upstream to remove this clause. If we > >>>> purge the Matrix sub-library to make CLHEP DFSG clean, it will be > >>>> useless for Geant4. > >> > >> This file ? > >> > >> http://alxr.usatlas.bnl.gov/lxr-stb4/source/external/CLHEP/Matrix/Mat > >> rix/Matrix.h > > It seems that upstream achieved to get relicencied under LGPL. Do you > have patch and repositionnery for the debian patches ? > > If not I will create a git tree from cvs. > > Bastien > Hi,
I have a git repository of CLHEP from 2.0.4.7 onwards as we have packaged it on our CERN Debian server. I could put that in debian-science and you could start from there? It includes the sources, am I allowed to redistribute the sources outside CERN? I am not experienced in these matters... If Lifeng has a version which includes more work (mine only includes upgrade to 2.1.0.1), then he should perhaps do it. Cheers, Yngve > >> seems to be bsd now > > > > BSD plus an extra anti-commercial clause stated below. > > > >> Could we implement a compatible wrapper using libeigen ? > > > > Sure, and the amount of work need to do seems reasonable. > > > > > > Kind regards, > > Lifeng -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7051579.O6OexiZDV2@yngve-chakra
