On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:51:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > 1. Separate the "Please cite" from the (apparently?) first reference of > > the References field in debian/upstream, and introduce a dedicated field > > (Citation) for it, so that non-article citation are possible. If > > Citation is not present, the current way should still work. > > What do you mean by non-article citation? I'm not sure whether I > understand your proposal? Could you fake some simple example? See mpqc and cp2k:
http://blends.alioth.debian.org/debichem/tasks/molecular-abinitio http://blends.alioth.debian.org/debichem/tasks/periodic-abinitio > > 3. Fix the displayed bibliographical data, some (the non-debian/upstream > > ones?) packages no longer display volume and page numbers. > > I'm not very motivated to fix the old (not-working any more) mechanism > to get "Published-In" working again. It was invented to circumvent even > more tags in the tasks files and was summarising some fields which are > now specified in a more detailed way. Re-enabling this old way would > mean either way more complex script or template code. I do not want to > do this just to make something I want to go away working again. It is > way less work to convert those few publications to debian/upstream - > even if I would need to do all this on my own. I would (strongly) > advise to rather use debian/upstream instead. Fine, I'll look into it when I get around. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
