Hi, On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:24:38PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:22:12PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > I think it would make most sense to stick to BibTeX if possible in the > > debian/upstream format, and further just accepting whatever different > > BibTeX formats there are. The web pages however would best look > > unified, so we could replace "--" by "-" on the web page, and again "-" > > by "--" for the BibTeX export at http://blends.debian.net/packages-metadata/ > > > > Would something like the attached patch work at least for displaying? > > Yep. Works perfect, is commited and the running code is updated - > thanks for the patch.
Cool! > However, I think there is no real need to "force" people to follow the > BibTeX convention in debian/upstream files. I also commited a change[1] > to the just announced BibTeX creation procedure which inserts a second > dash if it is missing. So we are safe for both sides: Your patch cares > for proper rendering of the tasks pages in case the debian/upstream file > might follow BibTeX convention and in turn the patch below ensures that > in the debian.bib file will all pages featuring the double dash (--). > > Is this OK? Yeah, exactly. I didn't mean to "force", just to make it easier to copy&paste bibtex output into debian/upstream. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
