Hi Charles, On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 07:09:31AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I think that we have to be careful to now emphasise too much about the "BibTeX > format". Many of the entries that Andreas corrected, I pasted the from the > BibTeX references provided by the publisher...
I was following the advise here: http://nwalsh.com/tex/texhelp/bibtx-23.html Besides explaining the form how a single name should be spelled it also says: "If there are multiple authors or editors, their names must be separated by the word "and", surrounded by spaces, not enclosed in braces:" > For the page separator, if this is already parsed at buildtime on the tasks > page, how about displaying it as Unicode double dash (–). This is what is > intended in TeX by the double ASCII dash (--). I like the idea in principle BUT I have fought severe fights with Unicode (I would go that far that 20% of the coding time was fighting against all kinds of coding troubles). I would accept a *working* patch but I will not ask myself for even more unicode trouble (even if I agree that it would be nice). Kind regards (and "good morning" to Charles - I'll go to bed now ;-)) Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
