Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 06:40:02AM +0200, Olе Streicher wrote: >> How is the process to include packages there? > It is basically editing the files in > > > svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/blends/projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks > > Any DD should have commit permissions by ACLs (if it does not work for > you I'd keen on knowing this). If it is not self explanatory you might > like to have a look in the Blends documentation[1].
I am not a DD yet. >> I recently packaged for the "astronomy" task: >> - saods9 > It is just mentioned in the task [...] >> - sextractor > Is just in task >> - iausofa-c > This is binary package libsofa-c-dev which I just added to > astronomy-dev. >> - starlink-pal > Same here: -> libstarlink-pal-dev >> - starlink-ast > -> libstarlink-ast-dev >> - wcstools > wcstools into astronomy > libwcstools-dev into astronomy-dev >> - wcslib > wcslib-tools into astronomy > wcslib-dev into astronomy-dev OK. >> - python-pywcs > into astronomy astronomy-dev (see below) >> - funtools > funtools into astronomy > Question: what about tcl-funtools? Should this be included > as well / instead > libfuntools-dev into astronomy-dev Sorry: I think this should be removed from the task lists. Although I recently packaged it, it is considered deprecated by its authors, and only used within saods9. It should not be used for new developments. >> - cpl > libcpl-dev into astronomy-dev >> - esorex > esorex in astronomy >> - python-cpl > I'm unsure where this might fit best Into astronomy-dev, like python-pywcs Just some more comments on the list: * wnpp "MIDAS" is of 2007 and is already archived. Keeping it on the list may be misleading. * The Python packages seem to have no defined place. Some (like python-pyfits) are in astronomy-dev, other (like python-scientific) are in astronomy. I think this should be consistent, and given that they are more used for writing analysis scripts than for interactive use, I would put them to "-dev". The same for "tcl" packages. * I have a package "xpa" that is designed to be of general use, but in fact only used by one, astronomical, package (saods9). Maybe it would be useful to put this onto the list as well? Best regards Ole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
