On Thu, 12. Jul 16:40, Baptiste Carvello wrote: > Well, this is a rather big project, not packaged in Debian and dead > upstream. Also, step 1.5a doesn't seem too difficult after all. For now > I implemented a very crude solution that only does the copying of the > extensions, and only for the cctbx package, but calling scons in an > external process should not be too difficult. Especially if I can rely > on the build directory to be already configured. > > I work in a git branch I called setuppy which is directly based on the > upstream snapshot. For now, I uploaded it to a clone on bitbucket: > https://bitbucket.org/bcarvello/cctbx/ > > I still have much work to do on it, but you can have a look if you want. Looks interesting! Just FYI scons commandline uses this method: SCons.Script.main().
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
