[CCed originally PM to debian-science because not private and potentially interesting for others as a summary of what was said about citations here before.]
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 08:17:47AM +0000, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > http://blends.alioth.debian.org/blends/ch-sentinel.en.html > > > might be what you might look for. > > exactly, thanks > > > However I *strongly* advise *not* to use the Published-* fields - rather > > use debian/upstream instead! > > is there an eplaination of the upstream format ? Seems we did made even to less noise about this in all the bibliography related mails on [email protected]. :-) https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata You might also like to read http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/06/msg00164.html I also prepared a very simple template with all fields you need for a citation http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/package_template/upstream?view=markup (details below are optional and can be simply left out). If you want to specify more than one citation per package you find an example here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/ncbi-tools6.git;a=blob;f=debian/upstream Note: The "Debian-Package" field is to *restrict* the citation to a binary package (otherwise a citation belongs to the whole source). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
