Am Sonntag, den 15.07.2012, 20:04 +0800 schrieb Lifeng Sun: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "givaro" > > * Package name : givaro > Version : 3.7.1-1 > Upstream Author : Thierry Gautier <[email protected]> > Jean-Jouis Roch <[email protected]> > Gilles Villard <[email protected]> > Jean-Guillaume Dumas <[email protected]> > Pascal Giorgi <[email protected]> > Clement Pernet <[email protected]> > * URL : http://ljk.imag.fr/CASYS/LOGICIELS/givaro/ > * License : CeCILL-B > Section : math > > It builds those binary packages: > > givaro-dev-doc - Developer Documentation for Givaro > givaro-user-doc - User Documentation for Givaro > libgivaro-dev - arithmetic and algebraic computations - development files > libgivaro1 - arithmetic and algebraic computations
To me it looks like givaro-dev-doc and givaro-user-doc should better be libgivaro-doc. The homepage says something about "user documentaion is lightweight" but to me it sounds like both are library documentation. So is there really a necessity for dividing between user and developers documentation at package level? Is there a necessity to ship both or could we only ship the more detailed(?) developers documentation? Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
