On Thu, 26. Jul 10:01, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > the only concern about this is if this modified libann is part of a > public API provided by cctbx. so is it possible to use #include > <cctbx.h> or something else without the header of this modify > libann ? They don't have a 'cctbx.h'. annlib_adaptbx is using ann_adaptor.h to include #include <ANNSELF_INCLUDE/ANN.h> I investigated this and it looks that only rstbx_integration_ext.so and annlib_ext.so are using this header.
> > for the extension to me this is not a problem you should build a > "private share library" called libann_adaptbx (like noinst_xxx target > with automake) [1]. > > If I remember correctly this link the the object of the noinst library > into the library which use it. > > If this is not clear for you do not hesitate to ask for a better > explaination. So you mean to link the symbols of this private library statically into the extensions? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
