Hi Dima, sorry for the delay. I admit I'm more involved in Debian Med and hoped for some other sponsor on Debian Science. This did not happened and thus I try to stand to my suggestion and will help you.
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 10:50:15PM -0800, Dima Kogan wrote: > > OK. Thanks, Andreas. > > I just finished the packaging of those two libraries. Their gitwebs are > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/libdogleg.git > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/liblbfgs.git > > libdogleg is more or less ready to go (i.e. I don't anticipate you'll find any > major issues). Hmmm, I noticed that you do not have a pristine-tar branch (in both archives) and I finally get dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)': no upstream tarball found at ../libdogleg_0.08.orig.tar.{bz2,gz,lzma,xz} Any reason to not use pristine-tar? > liblbfgs has something broken with its upstream build system which causes it > to > ignore external CFLAGS and LDFLAGS. This makes the hardening options be > ignored, > and things like DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt don't work. I looked into fixing it, > but > my automake knowledge isn't sufficient to do this yet. I don't know if this > issue precludes the package from being worthy of being uploaded. In either > case, > help with this would be appreciated. Despite also a pristine-tar is lacking (no idea how git-buildpackage worked around here - I'm not a Git expert) the build worked and as far as I would see it the lintian warnings about hardening are false positives. Looking at the build log the hardening options are injected and thus I uploaded the package. Kind regards and thanks for the preparations Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
