If the order doesn't matter, is it possible to package the most recent 6.0 version first?
Thank you, ST On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 07:30 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > thanks for the note. You are right, we should probably have it as a separate > source package. > > Anton > > 2013/9/12 Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>: > > Anton, > > > > Here is my two cents, given the large number of API/ABI changes, I > > doubt most rdepends will actually compile. > > Again *IMHO*, I would have upload vtk5.x one last time, and provide > > vtk6 as a separate source package (see what happen with tiff4/5 for > > example), to allow for a smooth transition. As stated before, I will > > not get involved in this process, so feel free to handle it the way > > you think is right. > > > > 2cts > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Anton Gladky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have started to package v6.0, but I am not sure, when it will be > >> packaged. > >> From my point of view, there is no big reasons to upload 5.10. > >> > >> Anton > >> > >> 2013/9/11 Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>: > >>> [top post sorry] > >>> > >>> As i explained, I was talking about vtk 5.10.1, I have no clue how > >>> hard it is to package vtk 6.0.0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1378973205.4429.117.camel@debox
