Hi Leopold, On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:45:36AM +0100, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > Yep. Perhaps some "echo 'Supressing tests for <some reason>'" might be > > helpful. > > done in rules file with override_dh_auto_test,
OK, this builds now. I checked for lintian issues: $ lintian ompl_0.13.0+git20130920.01d0ca4-1_amd64.changes I: ompl source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package libompl7 I: ompl source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package ompl-demos I: ompl source: duplicate-long-description libompl-dev libompl7 ompl-demos I: ompl source: vcs-field-not-canonical http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-science/packages/ompl.git http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/ompl.git I: ompl source: vcs-field-not-canonical git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/ompl.git git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/ompl.git I: ompl source: debian-watch-contains-dh_make-template I: libompl7: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/libompl.so.0.13.0 tEH the I: libompl7: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libompl.so.0.13.0 W: ompl-demos: unusual-interpreter usr/share/ompl/demos/PlannerData.py #!DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/local/lib Some of the 'I' severity issues are easy to fix. Since I'm a bit nitpicking I would really like you to fix the debian-watch-contains-dh_make-template thingy - this is a *real* watch file and no example, right. ;-) Also the Warning should definitely be fixed. > Deleted tag and created again with the new pushed version of the package. I think it makes things more easy if I'm doing the debian/* tagging since this is what we are really uploading. Otherwise we might play tagging ping-pong once some changes might be required. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
