On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 12:41 +0100, Jerome Kieffer wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:40:06 +0000 > PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > hello , How is it different from python-fftw ? > > More pythonic: numpy.fft like interface, plans are hidden to the user. > Younger project as well.
It supports both use cases: - for a one-time transform, you can use a numpy/scipy fft-like interface, - for repeated usage, you can use a Python class wrapping the internals of the plan, whilst providing a more Pythonic API. Compared to numpy.fft, it supports multi-threading and multiple floating precisions. Compared to python-fftw, pyfftw uses Cython to interface with the fftw library as opposed to ctypes (neither an advantage nor a drawback probably) and is extensively documented and tested (definitely an advantage). > -- > Jérôme Kieffer > tel +33 476 882 445 > > Ghislain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1383915339.2611.18.camel@LAT643
