Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:35:53PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi Jose, > > 2014/1/11 Jose Luis Rivero <[email protected]>: > > I'm done with upstream. Green light by my side to upload urdfdom, > > urdfdom-headers and sdformat, if the case of you find them in a good shape. > > urdfdo* should be repacked due to dfsg. But get-orig-source as far as I see > just downloads them without removing non-dfsg files. Please, describe also > in README.source what exactly was removed.
Risking that I'm repeating myself I'd like to recommend not to use README.source but rather the Files-Excluded field in debian/copyright. Than you can use latest uscan without any additional get-orig-source. > > BTW, thanks for taking care of console-bridge. Double checking the QA > > page I found that if fails to build in some platforms[1] due to problem > > with symbol checking. How would you recommend to fix this? Optional symbols? > > Sorry, I can not help you on that. I am personally not using symbols in any > of my libs. I also admit that if I really created symbols files this leaded to 50% failures on different architectures. I'm not sure whether the pros are stronger as the cons for symbols files. > Please, prepare git-patch for this debian-science meta-package [1]. Add all > of > these 4 packages. > > [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=blends/projects/science.git :-) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
