On 5 February 2014 at 19:19, Sebastian Gibb wrote:
| On Wednesday 05 February 2014 14:37:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Also, there are three packages on CRAN interfacing the NetCDF library:
| > 
| >       RNetCDF
| >       ncdf4
| >       ncdf
| > 
| > I never know which one is maintained and good as I don't use NetCDF-store
| > data.  Maybe you do and RNetCDF is the clear winner -- if not take a quick
| > look at the other two please.
|
| ncdf is obsolete and superseded by ncdf4. Both ncdf4 and RNetCDF provide a 
good 
| interface to NetCDF.

Ack.

| I prefer RNetCDF because CRAN ships windows binaries of it, too. For reasons 
| unknown to me RNetCDF is built for windows but ncdf4 is not.

Generally the author(s)/maintainer have to extra effort. For two more
complicated CRAN packages of mine, we give CRAN static libs [for 32 and 64
bit windows] of the required external library.  [ In one case, RQuantLib, we
have done so for many years. For another, RProtoBuf, we only did so very
recently and a friend / co-author actually cross-built the windows libraries
on Ubuntu (and had to try three different g++-mingw versions; apparently only
4.7 worked) ]

Dirk

-- 
Dirk Eddelbuettel | [email protected] | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to