Andreas Tille <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:32:50AM +0100, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote: >> I'd prefer debian-astronomy or -astrophysics. Otherwise we will have >> discussions about the inclusion of astrology >> software. debian-astrophysics may soound too professional and prevent >> amateurs from joining. Probably the name is open for voting ;-) > > If you want to go the naive route about voting please be prepared to > spend a lot of time with bike-sheders who *never* has done *any*
I just meant: let's discuss it here, and we take what most of the people who want to contribute prefer. In the moment it looks like "astro". >> > A developer mailing-list such as debian-astro-devel@alioth would be very >> > nice so we can all be in copy when each of us discuss something with >> > upstream, for instance. >> >> [email protected]? > > do you mean > s/alioth/lists/ > or > s/alioth/lists.&/ > ?? I didn't get this. -v please. Once we get the name decided, I will request a new mailing list on lists.debian.org. >> In the moment, I would not differ between users and developers, just >> like debian-science (which also has no -devel). > > Just make sure you have a user oriented list (as debian-science) and > a list that serves as the maintainer of the packages. I do not think > that mixing up these two is a good idea. Yes, I think the best way is as it is done for debian-science. Best Ole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
