2015-01-15 17:39 GMT+00:00 Jose Luis Rivero <[email protected]>:
> Hello Ghislain: > > On 15/01/15 18:27, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am currently packaging an update of libnfft. The new version brings > > along support for multi-precision, which means more binaries can be > > created and a transition should be occuring between the old and new > > package layout. > > > > Version 3.2 is currently in the archive and provides: > > - libnfft3-1 -- double precision version > > - libnfft3-dev -- headers and dev stuff > > > > Version 3.3, which also got a sodump, now builds: > > - libnfft3-double2 -- double precision version > > - libnfft3-single2 -- single precision version > > - libnfft3-long2 -- long double precision version > > - libnfft3-dev -- headers and dev stuff > > - libnfft3-2 -- transitional package, should probably install single, > > double and long versions > > > > Do I need to provide any specific breaks / replaces relationship between > > the packages to make sure the upgrade path is properly covered ? > > > > When I faced this same situation in the past, I found really useful the > following documentation pages: > > - https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition > - https://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package > > Hope it helps. Kind Regards. > > > These are great resources. Thanks for sharing. Am I right to assume case #8 in [1] ? Cheers, - Ghis [1] https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition
