Am 03.02.2015 um 21:09 schrieb Julien Puydt: > Hi, > > Le 03/02/2015 17:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit : >> Hi Julien, >> >> I like that the patch is still quite small. Are you aware of the similar >> patches Fedora is using? >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/ > > No... perhaps I should have a look.
The sagemath.spec is also interesting. It has short comments for the patches, lists the build and runtime dependencies etc. > >> I'll see if I get around to setting up a packaging git repo where the >> sage repo is included as a git submodule and your patch is applied via >> quilt. I think that way the packaging can be handled quite nicely. What >> do you think? I just need you to put the commands for building into >> debian/rules then. (Or if you want you can also set up everything.) > > I don't feel confortable with packaging sage myself, so my goal is to > grease things around so when someone gets to that work, things will go > smoothly. This is not about packaging, it's about doing things in git. For example, I applied your patch and ran 'make'. It starts to download and build patch, pkgconfig, bzip2. Now I think: these should be taken from Debian, am I doing something wrong or is it supposed to be like that? I have to ask you. If there's a debian rules build target I know that I'm building with the same command as you. I created the repository at http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sagemath.git/ There are some useful commands mentioned in debian/README.Debian Please consider using it (updating the patch) and putting the build command into debian/rules (is it just make?) Again I'm not even considering letting this produce a Sage package yet, and even if we do, it can't do any harm unless it's uploaded to Debian. > >> For the moment I just want to have this to have the things you do >> (install build dependencies, patch (the correct upstream commit of) >> sage, build, test) easily reproducable by everyone. Putting sage itself >> into packages is not so important just yet. >> >> Are you working on unstable or testing? I guess we can start with sage >> 6.5.rc0? > > I'm using unstable, and sage-6.5.rc0, but I'm moving forward with their > versions. The git submodule is perfect for moving forward with the versions, without having any interference between their and our commits. Best, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
