On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 08:20:57PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > Meanwhile, I have noticed an oddity concerning libnauty-dev : > the related information at > > http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/mathematics-dev#libnauty-dev > > are clearly obsolete.
Well, not that clearly since it is found in squeeze and wheezy (but you are right - I should kick at least squeeze from the list of parsed releases ... I actually assumed I would have done this). > I guess that it is related at some point that > libnauty-dev is no more a real package but a provided one: > > http://sources.debian.net/src/nauty/2.5r9%2Bds-1/debian/control/ [line 60] > > Do I miss something ? I just pushed $ git diff HEAD^ diff --git a/tasks/mathematics-dev b/tasks/mathematics-dev index 328f577..1d25936 100644 --- a/tasks/mathematics-dev +++ b/tasks/mathematics-dev @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Depends: libarmadillo-dev Suggests: libitpp-dev -Suggests: libnauty-dev +Depends: libnauty2-dev Suggests: libtestu01-dev Please note that I also replaced Sugests by Depends. While this has no effect since non-free packages will be "degraded" automatically it makes a difference once the package might be released under a free license. The essence of this issue is: Package maintainers should either maintain the Blends tasks files when creating new packages (and libnauty2-dev is per definition a new package since there is a new name string) or at least drop me a note. Thanks for noticing Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
