On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 04:06:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Further remark on the package after having a sponsoring look: Is there > any specific reason to name the source package gpaw-setups and the > resulting binary gpaw-data.
See the prior discussion, I though it was more in line with the rest of the science packages to call it -data. > For a single binary package it is more convenient to choose the same > name for both. Can you explain what the convenience is? Or rather what the problems with different names are? We have quite a few pacakges that are called as source package (due to upstream choices) than the binary package. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
