> > > > I only hope that one more packager will mean acceleration of the process > > and not the opposite - so we probably should coordinate and divide the > > work... > > > > I am more worried about the current status in Debian unstable due to the > gcc-5 transition. Dunno how (much) it will affect the upload to the archive.
So maybe we should create the initial package for Debian stable and then upgrade it for unstable (probably the diff will be minimal)? I might be wrong, but I think that all those problems with indirect dependencies might postpone the upload, but they should not affect the content of the package. Thats why I suggest to create the package for stable (which can be done now) and then wait until the problems with indirect dependencies settle down. Who knows, maybe it will happen in sync with us finalizing the initial package... Thank you, Zeev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
