Hi Thomas, sorry for my late reply - I was on vacation. It would have been to continue the discussion on the mailing list I CCed (which I do now as well) since others could have helped you in the meantime.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Thomas Schiex wrote: > Dear Andreas > > I'm sorry to realize I have ignored your reply to my "bug report" ton > the WNPP list (report which is now close to one year old). > > I'm not used to the debian way of processing packaging requests and it's > only recently that a local debian dev (which I contacted to have my GPG > key signed) pointed me my lack of reactivity. > > > Anyway, I'm still interested to proceed. Better late than never. > In your mail, > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780516 > > you said > > thanks for this interesting ITP. Since I assume you want to maintain > this package in the Debian Science team I'm hereby forwarding the ITP. > > > Yes. Debian science is ideal. What happens from here if we want to move > forward ? There is a document called Debian Science policy[1] which is unfortunately a bit outdated. Basically you should create an account on alioth.debian.org, apply to become a member of Debian Science team and commit your packaging in Debian Science Git repository. > Sorry again and thanks for your reaction, No need to sorry, you are welcome to ask more questions on the mailing list. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html -- http://fam-tille.de
