Drew,

5.2.1 came out yesterday with some of my PRs applied. Can you import it
please? I'd then go through the remaining issues.

Cheers,
Nico

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 9:43 PM Drew Parsons <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 11:00 +0000, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > > More important is that some dfsg files are still in the git tree.
> > > MATLAB/{spypart.m,time.m} and DOC/*ug.pdf.
> >
> > Aha yes. (Is the user guide really nonfree?)
>
> The argument is that the pdf is the useful bit, like a binary program.
>  Just as we need the source for binary files, for the same reason we
> want the source (the latex files) for the pdf files.
>
>
> > Unfortunately, I have no experience with automatically creating dfsg
> > tarballs, and there's a fair chance I'll do it incorrectly. I'd
> > appreciate if someone could take over from here.
>
> I've tidied up the dfsg handling, listing the reject files in
> debian/copyright.
>
> The package builds fine (and petsc3.7 seems happy with it).
>
> The last step is to check lintian,
>   lintian -i superlu_5.2.0+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes
>
> There's a handful of warnings, have a go at fixing them:
>
> W: superlu source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at
> line 109)
>  There are 2 licence short-names "permissive". Give one a distinct
>  short name from the other. permissive-colamd or something.
>
>
> W: superlu source: ancient-standards-version 3.9.5 (current is 3.9.8)
>
>
> W: libsuperlu5-dbg: empty-binary-package
>   Looks like debug symbols automatically went into libsuperlu5-dbgsym,
>   so libsuperlu5-dbg is redundant (i.e. rename in debian/control. Or
> specify -dbg as the debug package in debian/rules, e.g. with dh_strip).
>
> Thanks for your packaging efforts.
> Drew
>
> > Cheers,
> > Nico
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM Drew Parsons <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 09:49 +0000, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > > > I've pushed some more changes to [1] (including a patch) and it's
> > > now
> > > > compiling and installing alright. I guess a review would be in
> > > order.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Nico
> > > >
> > > > [1] alioth:/git/debian-science/packages/superlu.git
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to