Le 15/08/2016 à 14:38, Wolfgang Fütterer a écrit : > On Montag, 15. August 2016 09:25:46 CEST Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Le 15/08/2016 à 08:46, Wolfgang Fütterer a écrit : >>> I pushed the result of my effort to my personal public git repository at >>> alioth[1] for reviewing. Please feel free to leave comments, complaints >>> and >>> suggestions on how to improve it. >> I don't see any changes besides a git migration?! This wasn't super >> critical to me but why not.. > It was the first step for me. I took a while till I realized that the main > development of the package was in the tags branch and not in trunk. yes, sorry about that, I should have removed trunk (however, the vcs-* tag should be fine) Don't hesitate to remove all the svn stuff.
> But I must admit I have to figure out what to do next. > > One of my current work is to move away from cdbs to dh aka debhelper7. Again, > because I am more used to work with debhelper than with cdbs. this is a great idea, should not be too complex > Other priorities will be #749833 Not a big deal to me, they have been in the archive for a very long time... However, it would be nice to fix them if upstream can find a solution > and the packaging of scilab v6. Should not be too hard. Less fortran in the core. I did a branch for that but probably not in sync. >> I guess you are planning to move the package under the debian-science >> git repo, right? > Yes I will move the package to the debian-science git repo as soon as > possible. ok, please do that rather sooner than later > >> To be honest, I am a bit concern that your time is going to be as >> limited as mine as it took a year to do that (sorry for being blunt) > I understand that you're worried. When I decided to take ovr scilab I was a > little bit naive about the complexity of the package. But since I currently > have no job, I can spend more time on packaging. But I can't predict when > this > will change again. It is still better than no maintainer. I am still available to help or explain (I was one of the biggest contributors). thanks for doing it S
