On Sat, 19 Nov 2016, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > > * pandas > > * pymc > > * statsmodels > > * scikit-learn
> I'd also add at least those two: > * mpi4py > * seaborn > > Would you consider moving these packages to debian-science instead? This > > would enable team-maintenance for a larger team and may help to keep > > them in a good shape. At least, I don't want to join neurodebian just to > > fix the stuff in-place. > The question, of course, is if moving the packages will really magically > attract more maintainers... my understanding is that packages are maintained > in NeuroDebian by default to make it easier for NeuroDebian maintainers & > leverage the repository infra they have in place. But maybe something worth > considering anyways. Hi Ole and Yury, In general I don't mind at all moving (or better -- having moved ;) ) any of those packages under debian-science maintenance! Which one would you like to start with? e.g. statsmodels is indeed the interesting one. I have just uploaded fresh pandas (which brought new FTBFS :-/) with hope that some might just go away in statsmodels, but that didn't happen. I am still slowly working with statsmodels and have some non-pushed changes, but if you are keen to start with e.g. pandas and fixing up any of those issues as it being a part of Debian science -- it would be awesome. Just let me know which package(s) you want to start with so we don't overlap. Cheers, -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
