> I'm also not sure and people who know better than me should feel free to > close bug #849177.
doing it now > I'd be really happy if there are better solutions to > fix python-skimage in the next 36 hours. My reading of the arguments in > #849177 is that there are other reasons to revert the upgrade even > without the additional problem - thus I was opening the bug report > independently from other packages like python-skimage and python-skbio. ignoring for a moment all the maintainers that actually fixed their packages without much of a problem (which is what we would expect from debian maintainers), the only 2 complains came for: * skbio, not in testing since about a year, popcon of 7 * (now) skimage, not in testing since Sep '15 hardly any of them even close to a valid point to even think about reverting numpy upload. if you promptly followed these issues up with upstream (as what's a maintainer is expected to do), instead of engaging in a endless mail thread, those bugs may have been closed already. I'm not sure it's helpful for me to continue in this discussion, so hopefully closing this bug will make this thread stop. -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
